madness

"Writing is a form of madness. It must be exercised to be controlled."
Showing posts with label Twilight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twilight. Show all posts

Friday, November 2, 2012

Bad Book Reviews!


I'm launching my 'Bad Book Reviews' here now!

What qualifies a book as being a 'Bad Book'? Typically these are the books that have done well enough to earn a following of hatred.
 I'm open to suggestions, but the books must meet these criteria. One, the book needs to be pretty well known. Two, no self pubs, horror or excessively violent books, no non-fiction or politics. Three, I reserve the right to reject any and all recommendations. Four, I'm looking for books that might appeal to people, yet managed to still go wrong. Books that completely tanked for being terrible got there for a reason. I want books, that like certain 'B' movies, find there way onto shelves over and over, despite being terrible.
Got any ideas? Thus far on the chopping block are '50 Shades of Gray', and 'Twilight'. I've already read both, but I'm waiting on 50 Shades to do a comprehensive overall review of the trilogy.
So give me your suggestions! What are some terrible books out there that manage to sell? What books do you want me to critique with no holds barred honesty? Give me ideas!

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Vampires, and why Twilight isn't For Me.


I've always been a fan of vampire fiction. It started with Buffy when I was a teen, and Anne Rice (Yes, I was a teen dressed in black and chains reading "Interview with a Vampire" and "Lestat"), but more recently I almost hate to declare my love for the undead, since it always leads to the inevitable "Oh! So what did you think of Twilight?"

I will say this, having an internet account and moving in literary circles has made it impossible to avoid the anti-Twilight movement, the meme's, and the rants of people who did not like it. To be fair I did try to read summaries, and read the first chapter before making up my mind, but besides my innate desire to avoid 'book fads', I just found I could not suspend my disbelief, my ideals of vampires, long enough to want to read fully.


When I was a teen I spent much of my time in a vampire RPG chat. A lot of free-form character building, a lot of teens, and all the angst and drama of vampires. This is a big part of why I simply cannot fall in love with Twilight. After having seen every hackneyed vampire cliche, every angsty vamp/mortal romance played out by (mostly) flawed writing, I've no more room for the drama of "I'm undead, and your a teenager, but I love you enough not to kill you, or any other human being, because I’m a PG vampire in LOOOVE.”

This may not be fair, considering I haven’t read the books, but I think I’m just too old for the target demographic. Hell, I was bothered by the age and mentality of the twenty-one year old Anastasia in "50 Shades of Gray", the idea of a girl at the mentally and physically immature age of 16 dating and becoming obsessed with a man who looks her age but is centuries older bugs me. He is both old enough to know better, and yet we are supposed to view him as this romantic ideal man, wiser and stronger… Yet dumb enough to embroil her in a world of life or death vampire politics, werewolf games, and ultimately kill her at 19.

Then there’s Bella. Confused, lonely, typical teen. If they presented Bella as a more complete person, as a mature, self-contained individual (More like Buffy, or Katniss. Someone with inherent life experiences to lend her maturity) then the impossibility of the romance would make more sense to me as a reader.

Yes, Edward is breathtakingly lovely. Yes, any teenager with self-esteem issues would give her left hand to be worshiped by a male Adonis who thinks she’s amazing and special. (After all, that is how many sexual predators work.) Thing is, it’s all just too good to be true.

The appeal of vampires was always the trade-off of supernatural ability with deadly weakness. Vampires are super strong, beautiful, and seductive. They live forever, but they can never see daylight again, and they have no choice but to kill living, sentient human beings to continue their stolen immortality. The idea of feeding off animal blood so you can have a more sympathetic vampire is cute, but that’s not the point. Vampires are supposed to be deadly. They are supposed to be liars and seducers, stealing blood from the living so that they will not die. You can make the vampire sympathetic despite those issues, but it doesn't change the truth, vampires are dead. Vampires are predators. Vampires are murderers.

That’s what’s wrong with Twilight to me. Making vampires, all vampires capable of walking in the sunlight (except for fear of looking a little odd), and giving them phenomenal powers that they can obtain without being a danger to a human,  takes all the drama away. It leaves you with a shiny sparkly all too perfect hero with nothing to prevent a happy ending except for the possibility that he’ll snap his girlfriend in half in the bedroom, or that he’ll get the munchies while they snuggle in a sunlit field of daisies.

This is why I never got into Twilight. Bella is too young, too uncertain, too ordinary, and Edward is a shiny ideal without the deeper flaws that should be found in an immortal killing machine. I expect more from a vampire than stalking a teenager out of love. Stalking her for a snack makes much more sense.

Perhaps I am too jaded. I’ll stick to Underworld and True Blood. Even Buffy was a better tale for teens.